Categorical Information Carrier
LUCKNOW: A Public Passion Litigation (PIL) plea was once moved in Allahabad Top Court docket, on Wednesday, looking for instructions to the UP executive to seal the Gyanvapi mosque but even so transferring an utility in Varanasi District Court docket.
Whilst the appliance within the Varanasi district court docket to give protection to indicators to be had within the mosque advanced was once submitted by way of Advocates Manbahadur Singh and Anupam Dwivedi on behalf in their shopper Rakhi Singh, one of the vital lead plaintiffs within the Gyanvapi -Shringar Gauri case, the PIL within the Top Court docket was once moved by way of Jitendra Singh Vishen, president, Vishwa Vedic Sanatan Sangh, and family of Rakhi Singh.
The petitioners have expressed apprehensions that the Hindu indicators and logos provide on mosque premises may well be destroyed by way of non-Hindus.
The PIL advised the court docket to seal the premises with out affecting the ASI survey order of the Varanasi District Court docket.
Considerably, 5 Hindu ladies plaintiffs, together with Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas and Rekha Pathak have been from Varanasi and Rakhi Singh of Delhi, had moved Varanasi Civil Court docket (Senior Department) looking for the worship rights of Maa Shringar Gauri at the Gyanvapi premises via a plea filed in August 2021.
Each the appliance in Varanasi district Court docket and PIL in Allahabad Top Court docket have been filed only a day forward of the the most important Top Court docket order to be delivered on Thursday in reference to the ASI survey of Gyanvapi mosque premises.
Considerably, the PIL plea claims that on the disputed website (agreement Plot No. 9130 Ward and PS- Dashaswamedh, District Varanasi), a powerful temple used to exist, during which Lord Shiva himself established the “Jyotirlinga” lakhs of years in the past, then again, the mentioned temple was once broken/destroyed within the 12 months 1669 by way of emperor Aurangzeb.
Alternatively, responding to the advance, SM Yasin, joint secretary, Anjuman Intezamia Masajid (AIM), the mosque control committee known as the allegation baseless and mentioned, “Our suggest would reply on this topic.” The petitioner’s attorney Anupam Dwivedi mentioned the Varanasi district court docket had mounted August 4 as date of listening to.
The Allahabad prime court docket final week prolonged the keep at the ASI survey of Gyanvapi Masjid until the decision is pronounced on August 3. On July 21, the Varanasi district court docket ordered an in depth medical survey of the mosque by way of the ASI to determine whether or not it was once constructed over a pre-existing temple whilst maintaining {that a} medical probe is essential for reality to return out. The district pass judgement on Dr AK Vishvesha had directed the ASI to hold out a complete survey the use of relationship, excavation and floor penetrating radar tactics of the plot the place the mosque stands subsequent to the Kashi Vishwanath temple.
LUCKNOW: A Public Passion Litigation (PIL) plea was once moved in Allahabad Top Court docket, on Wednesday, looking for instructions to the UP executive to seal the Gyanvapi mosque but even so transferring an utility in Varanasi District Court docket.
Whilst the appliance within the Varanasi district court docket to give protection to indicators to be had within the mosque advanced was once submitted by way of Advocates Manbahadur Singh and Anupam Dwivedi on behalf in their shopper Rakhi Singh, one of the vital lead plaintiffs within the Gyanvapi -Shringar Gauri case, the PIL within the Top Court docket was once moved by way of Jitendra Singh Vishen, president, Vishwa Vedic Sanatan Sangh, and family of Rakhi Singh.
The petitioners have expressed apprehensions that the Hindu indicators and logos provide on mosque premises may well be destroyed by way of non-Hindus.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );
The PIL advised the court docket to seal the premises with out affecting the ASI survey order of the Varanasi District Court docket.
Considerably, 5 Hindu ladies plaintiffs, together with Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas and Rekha Pathak have been from Varanasi and Rakhi Singh of Delhi, had moved Varanasi Civil Court docket (Senior Department) looking for the worship rights of Maa Shringar Gauri at the Gyanvapi premises via a plea filed in August 2021.
Each the appliance in Varanasi district Court docket and PIL in Allahabad Top Court docket have been filed only a day forward of the the most important Top Court docket order to be delivered on Thursday in reference to the ASI survey of Gyanvapi mosque premises.
Considerably, the PIL plea claims that on the disputed website (agreement Plot No. 9130 Ward and PS- Dashaswamedh, District Varanasi), a powerful temple used to exist, during which Lord Shiva himself established the “Jyotirlinga” lakhs of years in the past, then again, the mentioned temple was once broken/destroyed within the 12 months 1669 by way of emperor Aurangzeb.
Alternatively, responding to the advance, SM Yasin, joint secretary, Anjuman Intezamia Masajid (AIM), the mosque control committee known as the allegation baseless and mentioned, “Our suggest would reply on this topic.” The petitioner’s attorney Anupam Dwivedi mentioned the Varanasi district court docket had mounted August 4 as date of listening to.
The Allahabad prime court docket final week prolonged the keep at the ASI survey of Gyanvapi Masjid until the decision is pronounced on August 3. On July 21, the Varanasi district court docket ordered an in depth medical survey of the mosque by way of the ASI to determine whether or not it was once constructed over a pre-existing temple whilst maintaining {that a} medical probe is essential for reality to return out. The district pass judgement on Dr AK Vishvesha had directed the ASI to hold out a complete survey the use of relationship, excavation and floor penetrating radar tactics of the plot the place the mosque stands subsequent to the Kashi Vishwanath temple.
