A significant debate unfolded in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday when the 130th constitutional amendment was introduced. The exchange became particularly intense between Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Congress General Secretary KC Venugopal. A series of statements made by Venugopal led to a strong reaction from the Home Minister, who countered the remarks.
The exchange was sparked by Venugopal’s reference to a past incident during the introduction of the 130th amendment. He brought up the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case from 2010, noting Shah’s position as Home Minister of Gujarat at the time. Venugopal questioned whether Shah was arrested and if he had followed ethical standards. This comment initiated a major uproar in the House.
Amit Shah responded sharply, challenging Venugopal on his statements regarding ethics. The Home Minister said that he too faced legal actions and imprisonment, but he resigned his position before the legal process continued. Shah also clarified that he did not hold a government position while the legal matters were underway.
The 130th constitutional amendment introduces key changes affecting high-ranking officials. It brings them under legal scrutiny, including the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and Union Ministers. It allows the removal of Ministers and Chief Ministers if arrested or detained, and mandates resignation if held in judicial custody for over 30 days. This is seen as a major step by the government to combat crime in politics. Furthermore, it requires the resignation of the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and cabinet members if they fail to get bail within one month of being arrested for any crime.
