
John Bolton, who once served as Donald Trump’s National Security Adviser, has been indicted on charges related to the unlawful retention and sharing of classified defense documents. The indictment, comprising 18 counts, alleges that Bolton improperly stored top-secret records at his home and disclosed sensitive information through personal notes detailing his government service. A significant aspect of the charges involves allegations that hackers, purportedly linked to Iran, accessed Bolton’s email account. This breach may have led to the exposure of classified files he had received. Prosecutors highlighted that a representative notified the FBI in 2021 about the email intrusion but did not disclose the compromised classified information or the potential for hackers to possess government secrets. This case involves a prominent figure known for his hawkish foreign policy views and his subsequent public criticism of Trump. The indictment has fueled concerns about political bias within the Justice Department, as it follows other legal actions against critics of the former president. Bolton has strongly refuted the accusations, framing the indictment as an act of political retaliation by Trump. He contends that the Justice Department is being utilized to prosecute those perceived as adversaries. Notably, the indictment was issued by career national security prosecutors, a detail that distinguishes it from certain other recent cases. While FBI searches of Bolton’s residences occurred in August, the investigation had been active for some time. The indictment details Bolton’s alleged sharing of over 1,000 pages of classified material with two relatives over several years, including sensitive intelligence on foreign adversaries, US operations, and missile launch plans. Officials have reiterated that accountability for compromising national security is paramount. Bolton’s defense is anticipated to challenge the prosecution’s narrative by pointing to inconsistencies or perceived double standards in how classified information handling has been treated in other instances within the government.







